The Federal Communications Commission demanded that CBS provide the transcription without editing a 60 minutes Interview with Kamala Harris, who is the subject of a complaint with the FCC and a lawsuit filed by President Donald Trump.
CBS News received a consultation letter on Wednesday in which the FCC requested “the complete transcription and without editing the camera” of the Harris interview, The New York Times reported today. “We are working to fulfill that research as we are legally obliged to do,” said a spokesman for CBS News to the media.
The president of the FCC, Brendan Carr, echoed Trump’s complaints about the alleged media bias before the elections and has taken measures to punish news broadcasters since Trump promoted him to the presidency. Complaints against CBS, ABC and NBC stations were dismissed Under former president Jessica Rosenworcel, but Carr Inverted those layoffs In his first week as president. Car too Ordered research In NPR and CBS.
Commissioner of FCC Anna Gómez, Democrat, criticized What called Carr’s last action to arm our transmission license authority. “
“This is a government retaliation movement against the issuing whose content or coverage is perceived as unfavorable,” Gomez said today. “It is designed to instill fear in the transmission stations and influence the editorial decisions of a network. The Communications Law clearly prohibits the commission to censor the issues and the first amendment protects journalistic decisions against government intimidation. We must Respect the rule of law, defend the Constitution, and safeguard public confidence in our supervision of the issues. “
CBS considers Trump’s demand resolution
Trump sued CBS for Harris’s interview, and the executives of the Global CBS Paramount owner have Celebrated liquidation conversations With Trump representatives. “An agreement would be an extraordinary concession of an important American media company for a acting president, especially in a case in which there is no evidence that the network was wrong or damaged the plaintiff’s reputation,” wrote the New York Times.