Arthur Hayes, the director of investments at Maelstrom and Co-founder as well as the former CEO of Bitmex, published a new essay entitled “The Ugly”, in which he maintains that Bitcoin could be ready for a short-term withdrawal before Finally ultimately finally finally finally finally finally, before finally, finally finally finally finally finally finally finally finally finally finally finally until the end of the end, finally before, ultimately ultimately ultimately finally finally finally finally finally being in the end Finally finally finally finally finally finally finally by walking towards unprecedented tops. While keeping its characteristic franchise, Hayes has two scenarios to buy bitcoin.
Buy bitcoin if this happens
Hay essay Starts by telling a sudden change in feeling that took him off guard. By comparing the financial analysis to the hinterland skiing on a sleeping volcano, Hayes remembers how the simple suspicion of danger of avalanche once forced him to stop and reassess. He expresses an equally difficult feeling about the current monetary conditions, an intuition he says that he felt at the end of 2021, just before the cryptographic markets were collapsed from their records.
“Subtle movements between the levels of the central banking assessment, the rate of expansion of bank credit, the relationship between prices / shares / bitcoin of 10 years, and crazy Trump memecoin Price action has produced a pit in my stomach, “he wrote, stressing that these signals collectively remind him of the precarious market situation before slowdowns 2022 and 2023. He specifies that he does not believe the Wider bull cycle is finished, but he plans that Bitcoin could fall into an interval of $ 70,000 at $ 75,000 before rallying suddenly to reach $ 250,000 by the end of the year.
Related reading
He describes this fork as plausible since the stock markets and the treasury markets appear, in his words, deeply tangled in an environment of “dirty fiat” which always arises with the vestiges of inflation and interest rates croissants. Hayes stresses that Maelstrom, his investment company, remains clear for a long time while simultaneously raising his assets in the stablescoins of the USDE to buy bitcoin if the price falls below $ 75,000.
In its opinion, short -term risk reduction allows it to preserve capital that can be deployed later when real market liquidation occurs. It identifies a 30% correction of current levels as a distinct possibility, while recognizing that the bullish momentum could continue. “If Bitcoin is negotiated at $ 110,000 over a strong volume with permanent expansion interest, I will throw in the towel and buy the risk above,” he wrote on his second scenario.
By trying to decipher why a temporary withdrawal could occur, Hayes says that large central banks – the Federal reserve In the United States, the Banque Populaire de China and the Bank of Japan – limit the creation of money, in some cases, in some cases increase the price of money by allowing yields to increase. He thinks that these changes could choke the speculative capital that has raised actions and cryptocurrencies in recent months.
Its discussion on the United States focuses on two locked outlook: that the Treasury yields at ten years could reach an area between 5% and 6%, and that the Federal Reserve, although Hostile in the Administration of Donald Trump, will not hesitate to reset the impression if it becomes essential to preserve American financial stability.
Related reading
However, he believes that at one point, the financial system will need an intervention – probably an exemption from the additional lever ratio (SLR) or a new wave of quantitative relaxation. He argues that the reluctance or slowness of the Fed to take these measures increases the probability of a short -term bond market sale, which could weigh on shares and by correlation, Bitcoin.
His political analysis houses the persistent enmity between Trump and the president of the Federal Reserve Jerome Powell, as well as the Fed’s desire to prevent a crisis during the presidency of Biden. He quotes the declarations of the former Fed governor William Dudley, and refers to the comments of the Powell press conference which suggested that the Fed could change its approach on the basis of Trump’s policies.
Hayes describes these tensions as a backdrop for a scenario in which Asset Could allow a mini-financial crisis to take place, forcing the hand of the Fed. Under such stress, the Fed would have no choice but to avoid a broader collapse, and monetary expansion could then follow. He suggests that it would be politically appropriate for the Trump administration to allow yields to browse crisis levels if it meant that the Fed would be forced to rotate in the impression of large -scale money than many in cryptographic circles S ‘Wait.
China, notes Hayes, had seemed ready to join the liquidity party with an explicit reflation program until a sudden tour in January, when the PBOC interrupted its bond purchase program and allowed the Yuan de se Stabilize in a stronger position. He attributes this change of policy to internal political pressures or possibly to strategic maneuvers for future negotiations with Trump.
Hayes also acknowledges that some readers could find the correlation between bitcoin and traditional risk assets perplexed, given the long -term argument that Bitcoin is a single reserve of value. However, it indicates the graphics showing an increasing correlation of 30 days between Bitcoin and the Nasdaq 100.
In the short term, he says, the main cryptocurrency remains sensitive to Fiat liquidity changes, even if the part is finally negotiated on an unrealed base on prolonged time horizons. He thus portrays Bitcoin as a leading indicator: if Bond gives peak peaks and the stock markets fall, Bitcoin could start his dive before technological actions follow. Hayes thinks that the authorities trigger a renewed monetary stimulus to stifle volatility, bitcoin would be the first at low and rebounded.
He admits that the forecast of the exact results is impossible and that any investor must play probabilities perceived rather than certainties. His decision to hide is derived from the concept of expected value. If he thinks that there is a substantial chances of a decline of 30% compared to a lower probability that Bitcoin continues above before it decides to buy a bonus of 10%, reduction Exhibition always gives a better risk-reversed relationship.
“Trading does not concern good or evil,” he says, “but on the trade of probability perceived and the maximization of the expected value.” He also underlines that this protection position allows him to wait for the type of dramatic liquidation movement in altcoins which often accompanies a collapse of the short-term bitcoin, a scenario which he calls “Armageddon” in the so-called “space Shitcoin ”. In such circumstances, he hopes that many funds available to collect fundamentally solid tokens at very depressed prices.
At the time of the press, BTC exchanged $ 102,530.
Star image created with dall.e, tradingView.com graphic